|
Ed
Momkus reaches for sonic heaven
with
the $3,800
Lyngdorf RP-1
RoomPerfectTM
Room
Correction Device
May,
2008

|
Specifications:
Type:
Room correction processor
Frequency
Response: 20 ~ 20kHz, +/- 0.1dB
S/N ratio:
113dB, analog to analog (at Neutral voicing
Ref 4.4V)
Dynamic
range: 113dB, analog to analog (at
Neutral voicing Ref 4.4V)
Channel
separation: 114dB
Input
sensitivity: 4.4V (2.2V with high
sensitivity)
Input
impedance: 10kΩ balanced & single-ended
DAC output
impedance: 50Ω
THD+N:
103dB, A-weighted, analog to analog (at
Neutral voicing Ref 4.4V)
Power
consumption: 4W (standby mode), 23W
(operate mode)
Dimensions:
17.72 W x 13.58 D x 3.94 H (inch)
Weight:
14.6lb
MSRP:
$3,800
Manufacturer:
Lyngdorf
U.S.
Distributor:
Triad Speakers,
Inc.
15835 NE Cameron
Blvd.
Portland, OR
97230
Tel. (800)
666-6316
URL:
http://www.triadspeakers.com/index.html
Email: fill out
online form |
WHY
WE NEED ROOM CORRECTION
If you’ve read about
human hearing, the effects of your listening environment
on your sound, and the difficulties associated with
getting realistic bass, skip the first two sections and
proceed to “My Prior Attempts to Deal With My Room”. If
not, read on.
How does human hearing
work? Most of what follows was pulled from several
sources, notably
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/sound,
maintained by Georgia State University.
The first thing to
understand is that you perceive different frequencies
differently at different dB levels. As the Georgia State
University website puts it:
|
“The
measured threshold of hearing curve shows
that the sound intensity required to be
heard is quite different for different
frequencies. The standard threshold of
hearing at 1000 Hz is nominally taken to be
0 dB, but the actual curves show the
measured threshold at 1000 Hz to be about 4
dB. There is marked discrimination against
low frequencies so that about 60 dB is
required to be heard at 30 Hz. The maximum
sensitivity at about 3500 to 4000 Hz is
related to the resonance of the auditory
canal.” |
This is illustrated by
the following chart:

A related thing to
understand is that the differences between how we
perceive the loudness of different frequencies can be
very large.
|
“For very
soft sounds, near the threshold of hearing,
the ear strongly discriminates against low
frequencies. For mid-range sounds around 60
phons, the discrimination is not so
pronounced and for very loud sounds in the
neighborhood of 120 phons, the hearing
response is more nearly flat.” |
We audiophiles have
experienced the problem that arises when you turn the
volume way down: the bass becomes less pronounced. The
Georgia State University website puts it as follows.
|
“One of the
implications of this aspect of human hearing
is that you will perceive a progressive loss
of bass frequencies as a given sound becomes
softer and softer. For example if you are
listening to a recording of an orchestra and
you turn the volume down, you will find that
the bass instruments are less and less
prominent. This is the purpose of the
so-called "loudness contours" on audio
amplifiers; they allow you to boost the bass
frequencies when you are listening at low
sound levels to give you a more realistic
balance of the high and low frequencies in
the music.” |
These principles have
been translated into a series of graphs that show
perceived loudness of different frequencies at different
decibel levels. You can see that in some cases the
perceived “loudness gap” between low, middle and high
frequencies is quite huge, while in other cases, such as
when the music as a whole gets louder, the differences
shrink. These graphs also show the frequency range in
which our ears function most efficiently. These
differing perceptions of loudness then become further
complicated by reflections caused by the room, including
reflections that reinforce particular frequencies, or in
some cases create nulls that completely cancel out a
particular frequency.

As if the vagaries of
human hearing aren’t enough, your room will affect the
sound of any speaker you try. This means that any set of
speakers you try will sound very different in different
rooms. Furthermore, depending on the particular speaker
and its interaction with the room, as well as the
particulars of your own hearing, a pair of speakers may
sound good or poor at different volume levels. You’ve
probably experienced some systems that sound very good
at low volume levels, but others that don’t sound right
unless you’re playing at higher volumes. On practical
effect of this is that some speakers sound better when
played louder or, in some cases, will only sound
good when played loudly. If you put such speakers in a
room that muddies the bass or has trouble replicating
the lowest bass notes you will invariably exacerbate the
problem. If you could eliminate the room interaction you
would at least be able to retain respectable bass
reproduction at lower volume levels.

GETTING THE BASS “RIGHT”
Your listening
environment affects all frequency ranges, but
anomalies in the bass are the toughest to fix. Even when
listening to very high-end systems, I often had the
feeling that the bass was too timid, or too flabby, or
that it lacked realistic weight. Moreover, whenever I
went to a live indoor concert I was always struck by the
fact that the bass seemed louder and more powerful than
what I heard coming out of so-called “high-end” systems.
In fact, it bothered me very much that many renowned
reviewers seem to praise products that totally fail to
produce realistic bass. (I don’t want to start a war
here, but I include a few of the most renowned reviewers
and highly praised products in this category – perhaps
I’ll put a list together and include it in a future
article.)
As a result, I put
years of effort into addressing bass reproduction in my
main system. I purchased a front-end that went as low as
possible, secured amps with great bass weight and
installed speakers that were capable of realistically
replicating 25 Hz. I supplemented this by working with
an assortment of accessories, including cables, power
conditioners, isolation, room treatments, etc. Bit by
bit I inched closer to the goal. I minimized bass boom.
I attacked slow and bloated bass. I added more bass
weight. The problem was, I often improved one aspect of
the bass, but affected a different aspect. Finally, in
the middle of 2007 I achieved what I felt was the best
bass I’d heard in any of my own personal systems, and in
most cases better than the bass I’d heard in other
high-end systems. However, it still seemed to
occasionally lack the slam that I heard in live concerts
at top notch venues, and I began to think that I would
never get it completely right in my current room.
My Prior Attempts to
Deal With my Room
As you can see, I have
been acutely aware of the effect that the room has on an
audio system, and I’ve taken very extensive steps to
address the problem. My listening room sports three 20”
x 78” ASC Tower Traps, two 20” x 48” ASC Tower Traps,
one 16” x 48” ASC Tube Trap, two 16” x 60” Quarter Round
traps, twelve 8” x 48” ASC Sound Panels and 4 Corner
Busters. I’ve been to very high-end listening rooms, but
I’ve only encountered 2 or 3 that have paid as much
attention to room treatments as I have. Consequently, I
assumed that digital room correction would have some,
but not much, effect on my listening environment.
Furthermore, I have always felt that I should keep the
signal as “pure” as possible, and that introducing
A-to-D and D-to-A conversion is audiophile blasphemy.
However, a true audio addict eventually has to try
everything, so I asked Constantine Soo if I could review
a digital room correction system for Dagogo. He told me
to have at it, so I started to look for a model that
would work well in my system. As it turned out, it
wasn’t as easy as I thought it would be.
The first problem I
encountered related to my Esoteric P-70/D-70 front-end.
The Esoteric sounds the best in its dual AES mode. In
the dual AES mode, the transport splits the digital
signal into left and right and transmits the signal this
way to the DAC, which accepts the left and right digital
signals. The dual AES mode ONLY operates with AES/EBU
digital cables – no RCA cables need apply. This means
that any black box that would go between my transport
and DAC must accept dual AES/EBU cables and also output
a dual digital signal via dual AES/EBU cables. Seen any
device that meets those criteria? Nope! That meant that
whatever device I used would have to be inserted in the
analog path of my system.
The second thing I
encountered was the dearth of room correction devices
which employ balanced analog inputs and outputs. Not
only does the P-70/D-70 combo sound best with AES/EBU
digital cables running between the transport and DAC,
but it also sounds better via its balanced analog
outputs, and I run my whole system balanced. Few digital
room correction systems have balanced analog inputs and
outputs.
After all of these
limitations were taken into account, the only room
correction system that would work for me was the
Lyngdorf RP-1. I was initially worried that I wouldn’t
be able to compare the Lyngdorf to other room correction
devices. I will tell you right now that I had no reason
to worry. I don’t know if other room correction devices
are better, but the Lyngdorf RP-1 wrought great
improvement in my system.
Who Sells Lyngdorf?
Or maybe even more
importantly, how do I get a Lyngdorf? I had no
idea. Lyngdorf distributes its products through a
limited number of dealers, but it just so happens that
one of them is Ken Walker of Sound Design Systems,
located in Winfield, IL, which is a western suburb of
Chicago. I was happy that there was a dealer in the
Chicago area, but I was apprehensive after I looked at
his website. I worried that he would be a home theater
guy who would not appreciate my two-channel obsession. I
should never have worried. Ken turned out to be an audio
enthusiast who loves great two-channel music and fine
tequila. He was incredibly helpful by securing a demo
RP-1 and personally coming to my house to install and
program it.
I want to make clear
that I never told Ken that I’m a reviewer or that I
write for Dagogo. I simply told him that I’m interested
in the RP-1 and would like a demo, and he showed up on a
Saturday morning to install it.
There is also the
question of who is Lyngdorf? It’s a company named
after its main man and chief designer, Peter Lyngdorf.
We are not talking about a novice designer. I won’t go
through Peter Lyngdorf’s entire audio history, but I
will mention the name Tact Audio and the Millennium
digital amp. Yep – that Peter Lyngdorf.

WHAT
ARE WE DOING HERE?
Legitimate
philosophical question, but that’s not what I mean. The
question is, what does digital correction actually do?
As it turns out, different correction devices have
different goals. Some are massively ambitious devices
that allow you to tri-amp your speakers and adjust the
bass, midrange and treble, as well as adjust for the
effects of the room. Others are less ambitious and make
limited adjustments to the speakers, or try to make
adjustments in the time domain. I encourage you to go to
the Lyngdorf website for a detailed description of what
Peter Lyngdorf is trying to accomplish with the RP-1,
since I will only summarize it here.
As I understand it,
Peter Lyngdorf starts with the assumption that you
basically like your speakers and do not want to mess
with their fundamental sound. Based on this assumption,
the RP-1 does not try to correct for speaker
performance. Instead, the concept is to allow the
speaker to sound its best by only adjusting for the
pernicious effects of the room. How does the RP-1 do
this? No idea. For all I know, Lyngdorf could be
applying secrets learned from the Krill who
reside on the planet Zartran. I know something
about the electronics and design theories that apply to
preamps, amps and speakers. I know less about the
technology behind transports and DACs, but enough to
sound intelligent (I talk a good talk). However, I know
nothing about sophisticated digital correction
devices, so I am acting here purely as a subjective
reviewer.
INSTALLATION
Installing
the RP-1 was simple. I know, how can it not be simple
when someone else installs it for me? Well, I’m an
obsessive guy, so even though Ken Walker installed the
system for me originally, I later disassembled and
reprogrammed the system using different speakers, such
as the $28,000 Eventus Audio Lysitheas (review to
follow). In my case, I inserted it between by preamp and
amp. You can also insert the RP-1 into your system via a
tape loop, or you can put it between your source and
your preamp, although this last method is not desirable
if you have multiple sources.
After connecting the
RP-1, you need to set the measurement volume level.
Setting the measurement volume level is important, since
the microphone must be able to pick up the test tones,
but the volume shouldn’t be so loud as to risk clipping.
This is very easy, as the RP-1 actually tells you
whether you should increase or lower the volume.
The next step is to
measure the distance from the speakers to your ears when
you are sitting in your principal listening position.
The distance information is then input into the RP-1.
Once these initial
steps have been taken (about 10 minutes), you connect a
supplied microphone (microphone stand and long cord
included) and position it at your principal (called
“focus”) listening position. You then run a series of
test tones, all of which are automatically initiated and
measured by the RP-1 from your left and right speakers.
Once this sequence is completed, the RP-1 tells you the
percentage of “Room Knowledge” it acquired from the test
tones and invites you to measure a second position in
the room. You then move the microphone at least 1 meter
to the left or right and repeat the test tones. This
process is repeated at different positions in the room
until you maximize the RP-1’s “Room Knowledge”. In my
case, I stopped at 99% “Room Knowledge”. You’re done.
The entire process took me 24 minutes; it might have
taken me 35 minutes if I had not seen Ken Walker do it
the first time.
Keep in mind that this
process needs to be repeated if you move or change
speakers, or do something else significant to your
listening room, but once you’ve done it the first time
you will breeze right through it. The RP-1 also allows
you to display the amount of correction being applied to
correct for the anomalies of your room. In my case, the
correction level was only 10%, which I understand is on
the low end of expected correction. This was consistent
with my expectations, given the extensive room
treatments I’ve installed.
This is not the end of
the Lyngdorf RP-1’s capabilities, which include the
ability to integrate dual subs, which can be a great
boon in satellite systems. However, I did not bother
doing this since the RP-1 transformed my full-range
speakers into really full-range speakers. If you
have a satellite/sub system, you should seriously
consider the Lyngdorf (or something like it). I suspect
that you will find your system transformed. You can find
this info on Lyngdorf’s website (http://www.lyngdorf.com)
in the RP-1 owner’s manual that is posted on the site.
LISTENING & COMPARING

Despite the fact that
the correction percentage was only at 10%, the
improvement in the sound was very large. Everything
sounded better.
First, the lowest bass
notes were now clearly audible, whereas they were
previously a muffled rumble. Second, the impact of the
bass was dramatically enhanced. Kick drums really kicked
with a force I had not previously experienced. Third,
and this may relate to the second, the timing of
everything improved, with more coherence to the music.
Fourth, gaps in some lower midrange and upper bass
frequencies got filled in, creating more body and warmth
to the presentation. Fifth, the relationship between the
lowest and highest notes became more natural and
realistic-sounding – more like they are heard in a live
concert. I did not need to turn the volume up to get the
bass intro to sound lifelike, only to be forced to turn
the volume down when the vocalist began singing. Here
are three examples.
The lowest bass
frequencies on the Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab Ultradisc
of Yes’ Fragile (UDCD 766) were felt before the
Lyngdorf, but were not distinct notes in my system.
Other listeners would rave about the bass, but I knew
that there were some notes that I was not really
hearing. The instant the RP-1 was engaged, those notes
became clear tones, not just a rumble, and the organ and
lead guitar snapped into much better focus. I
involuntarily pumped my fist and blurted “Yesssss!”
(Really)
The Supreme Beings of
Leisure’s self titled CD (PALMCD 2006-2) contains a tune
entitled ‘Strangelove Addiction’. This piece has
synthesizers, bass and a variety of percussion and other
instruments that collapse into a big mess if the system
cannot sort out all of the rhythms and sustain the
music’s drive. I though that my system did a pretty good
job of it until I heard it with the RP-1 engaged. For
the first time, everything fell into place. I heard
notes I had not heard before.
The first track on
World Party’s Private Revolution (Chrysalis F2
21552) is not a very good recording, and it contains
what sounded like the sounds of a compressed organ that
swirl around the center of the soundstage. Mildly
interesting, but certainly not memorable. However, with
the RP-1 engaged these sounds clarified and expanded in
both width and depth and, for the first time, were
clearly an organ. It was as though I had just received a
superbly remastered replacement to an old, poorly
mastered CD.
These experiences were
repeated with every recording I played. But that’s not
all. The Lyngdorf RP-1 allows you to engage room
correction in FOCUS mode, GLOBAL mode or BYPASS mode.
FOCUS mode is the best correction algorithm for you main
listening position. GLOBAL mode lessens the effect at
you main listening position, but enhances the sound
throughout the room, which is perfect if you have
several people seated in different locations. BYPASS
allows you to engage and disengage the RoomPerfectTM
digital room correction algorithms and compare
processed to unprocessed sound. This can be done from
the remote control. You can compare the processed and
unprocessed sound in a direct A-B fashion (make sure you
equalize the volume). Doing so is instructive. The
improvement is immediate and unmistakable. You will
wonder why your mother never told you about this when
you were growing up.
In addition, the
Lyngdorf RP-1 allows you to “voice” the resulting sound.
Voicing applies an EQ filter that makes mild adjustments
designed to either: (a) compensate for recordings that
sound too bright or dark or (b) adjust the sound for
your own personal preferences. The Voicing settings are
called Neutral, Music 1, Music 2,
Relaxed, Open, Open Air, and
Soft. These settings correspond to the frequency
curves displayed below (from
Owner's Manual).

I preferred Neutral
about 95% of the time, but some visitors liked the
Music 1 and Soft filters slightly better.
They all said that the improvement that came from
engaging the RP-1’s processing far overshadowed the
additional adjustments you could make to suit your own
personal preference.
CONCLUSION
The Lyngdorf RP-1 has
changed my entire perception of equalization. I know –
this is not the equalizer of the 1970’s, but I have
always considered it a sacrilege to mess with simple and
pure two-channel sound. To my ears, the Lyngdorf RP-1’s
contribution ranks among the top improvements I’ve made
at any time since I took up this hobby, and it’s clearly
the largest improvement since I’ve had my reference
system of Esoteric P-70/D-70, Electrocompaniet Nemo
Monoblocks and B&W Nautilus 800Ds.
When you consider that
I have over $5,000 worth of room treatments and that I
could have avoided buying them, and can now actually
consider removing them, the $3,800 cost of the RP-1 is a
bargain. In fact, I think it’s fair to say that the
Lyngdorf RP-1 is the most cost-effective piece of audio
hardware that I’ve personally tried. This does not even
take into account that fact that an audiophile can
address the Spousal Approval Factor by moving speakers
closer into walls and corners. The Lyngdorf allows much
more latitude in speaker placement since it addresses
the speakers’ interaction with the room and will correct
for less-than-ideal positioning.
The only thing that the
Lyngdorf DP-1 might have considered adding was the
ability to program custom voicing, which would allow a
user to, in addition to the preprogrammed voicing
filters, create a filter that perfectly matches his
personal taste.
For example, such a
feature is built into the Copland DRC205, which permits
a user to use the programmed filters or to connect the
unit to a computer and create a custom filter. However,
I really like the RP-1’s Neutral voice setting,
which happens to exactly match what I personally
think is the most realistic voicing that I can get from
my B&W 800Ds. (Not to mention the fact that the Copland
does not provide any balanced inputs or outputs.) Thus,
I feel absolutely no need to program any further custom
filters, especially in view of the fact that the filter
choices provided by Lyngdorf address most problems
created by poor recordings.
Though the RP-1 is an
add-on “black box”, you can also purchase a Lyngdorf
DPA-1 digital preamp that incorporates RoomPerfectTM
room correction. I kind of wish I had heard of the
Lyngdorf DPA-1 before I purchased my current preamp. I
love my MBL 5011 preamp, but adding it did not make
anywhere near the impact of adding the RP-1. Assuming
that the quality of the other digital features was up to
par, I might have saved a ton of money and gotten a
preamp that incorporated room correction.
As final proof of how
impressed I was with the wonderful effect that this
product had in my system, I bought one. Not the review
sample whose price I might have negotiated to save
Lyngdorf the shipping costs, but a new full-price RP-1,
including Illinois taxes. Now that’s an endorsement!
(It is so difficult to convince my fellow Dagogoans to
always purchase products at industry accommodation
prices. Sigh. –Ed.)
COMMENT FROM LYNGDORF:
Excellent
review - which I feel captures the essence of
RoomPerfect. Ed’s review accurately captures Lyngdorf’s
room correction philosophy in the paragraph titled, “What
Are We Doing Here” as well as the improvements in
sound it provides. Bravo!
It might
be helpful to note that a primary differentiator of the
Lyngdorf RP-1 from other room correction systems is that
it maps the entire listening space in 3 dimensions.
This is
illustrated by the fact that after you take the Focus
Position measurement at the listening position, you are
supposed to take subsequent Room Measurements with the
microphone randomly positioned and oriented in
3-dimensional space. This means up near the ceiling,
down near the floor, near walls, in open and adjoining
areas, etc. Other systems look for mic to be located
solely at the listening position (1-D) or at multiple
listening positions (i.e. in 2-D plane).
On
background information described in the paragraph
titled, “Who Sells Lyngdorf” (last paragraph),
while Peter is
definitely the Main Man at Lyngdorf Audio (he is the
owner and inspiration of the company), he is not the
chief designer. That role is held by Lyngdorf Audio’s
CTO Jan Abildgaard Pedersen, who happens to be one of
the world’s foremost acousticians as well as a brilliant
engineer and programmer. In fact, Peter has assembled
one of if not the most remarkable engineering staffs in
the history of high end audio. Over 30 of the 50+
employees are engineers, including the CEO. Talk about
engineering driven! (BTW, Peter also owns Dali
Speakers.)
I was
please to see you mention the real world applications of
RoomPerfect where speakers can be made to sound their
best in the locations where most of us are forced to
listen to them – typically much closer to the front wall
than ideal for best frequency response. However, this
close-to-the-wall placement provides an additional
benefit: since the direct and reflected sounds are
emanating from (almost) the same point in space,
transient response and attack are improved, giving even
better performance on percussion and plucked
instruments. Domestic tranquility is merely a bonus.
Steve
Colburn
Triad
Speakers
Lyngdorf
U.S. Distributor
Other reviews
by Ed Momkus
DAGOGO's Staff and their
articles
Send your feedback to
us:
editor@dagogo.com
©Dagogo 2008. All rights reserved. |