Publisher Profile

B.M.C. PureDAC Review

By: |

Headphone use

As stated above, I don’t own balanced headphones, so all listening were done with my Sony MDR 7506 cans.  I switched back and forth between the respective headphone amp sections of the PureDAC and my Rogue 99 preamp.  After listening to several CD albums I was able to formulate discernible sound differences between the two.  One notable difference is tonal balance, with the PureDAC being more linear without any part of the frequency range being prominent, resulting in a nice ruler-flat presentation.  The Rogue was fairly close in this regard with the exception of treble being a little attenuated in comparison.  This result is not large but it is noticeable on some of the albums used.

Another difference between the headphone amps is tonal color or harmonic texture.  The Rogue is slightly warmer and darker sounding, especially in the mid-band.  This results in a fuller sound, though the PureDAC did not sound lean by any means.

One perplexing difference is that the Rogue emphasizes male and female vocal sibilants more than does the PureDAC.  This is perplexing because the amount of sibilance is approximately equal with the two components when listening with speakers.  On the Decemberists’ The Crane Wife, for example, Colin Meloy is spitting out more snakes on the title track through the Rogue headphone amp.  I applaud head Decemberist Colin Meloy’s inspired effort in putting some Japanese folk tales into a thematic album.  For me, this is great music.

The PureDAC headphone section is an excellent monitoring device, with the ability to reveal, reveal, and reveal.  No, I don’t mean the component highlights detail ad infinitum.  What I mean is the musical detail is naturally rendered within the fabric of the performance.  I have auditioned several popular headphone amps which are resolution monsters, but leave my ears bleeding from its laser sharp focus.  In my opinion, it is an exciting but not a natural presentation; certainly not what I hear at live concerts.  The live performance may be loud and distorted, but detail is always within the whole of the composition and each detail is never highlighted separately unless intended by the performer.

The sound quality of the headphone amp section on my Rogue Super Magnum preamp is very good, but I like the PureDAC slightly better.  I can only wonder how much better the balanced headphone output is with this unit if I had the correct headphones.

Balanced vs. unbalanced

Since my electronics are old school, equipped with only RCA single ended connections l brought the PureDAC to an audio buddy’s place.  We connected the unit to his EMM Labs Switchman preamp/controller and ATC SCM powered loudspeakers using one meter balanced, as well as one meter RCA cables from the same manufacturer.  I set equal SPL level for both on the Switchman by using the sound meter app on my friend’s iPad.  This allowed me to switch between inputs easily.  Listening in 24/96 format to Ryan Adams’ Heartbreaker album and Keith Greeninger’s cover of the Grateful Dead’s “Friend of the Devil” – both excellent sounding recordings – I could not hear any sonic differences between balanced and unbalanced when switching back and forth on the EMM Labs controller. Both recordings sounded vibrant and immediate with the appropriate cues of live recordings.  Theoretically, there should be no difference in sound with short length cables because the possibility of interference of any kind is minimize.  My limited experiment confirmed the theory in this instance.

All’s well that ends well

The design, execution, fit and finish, are indicative of a component costing much more than the $1,790 retail asking price.   When you include the quality of refined sound that this unit produces, it adds up to great value in true high end audio systems.  If you are someone who likes sharper, more technical color sound than the PureDAC offers, it may not be suitable for your taste.  But if you are like me, someone who attends dozens of concerts each year, and want to achieve a similar, emotional musical connection with his or her audio system, then you should seriously consider auditioning the PureDAC.  What the PureDAC does so well is to bring out the intention of the performer, so the result is you are enjoying the musical message instead of listening to your equipment.  For anyone looking for a DAC, or a DAC/preamp/headphone combination with the qualities and price I described, I recommend auditioning the PureDAC.  Until next time, I wish you happy listening.

Associated Components:

  • Digital front end:
    OppO 981 DVD player, mainly used as a transport
  • Amplification:
    Rogue Audio Ninety Nine Super Magnum preamp
    EMM Labs Switchman control center and preamplifier
    Virtue Audio M451 Sensation digital switching integrated amplifier with Astron power supply
    Music Reference RM10 tube amplifier
  • Loudspeakers:
    KEF R300 stand mounted speakers (under review)
    ATM SCM active tower speakers
  • Cabling:
    Audio Sensibility Impact RCA interconnects
    Audio Sensibility Testament speaker cable
    Audio Sensibility Statement digital S/PDIF cable
    Supra Cables power cord
    Triode Wire Labs power cord
  • Accessories:
    Redpoint Black hole isolation feet

8 Responses to B.M.C. PureDAC Review


  1. David Kellogg says:

    Paul’s a pistol! Each review is more imaginative than the next, in both prose and practicality. I always find an image that sticks in my mind long after the review is gone.
    This time, it was the confection of an all-socialist beauty pageant for audio components. (Ees nexxt Schweem-wear)
    Love those knee-high slush boots comrades!
    But this review is anything but slush. Thanks for more entertaining –but also informative all-the-while imaginative– read.
    Can’t wait for the next go-’round!

  2. Paul Mah says:

    We must share a smoke comrade. You do not want to see the contestants in Shweem-wear, will remind you of be-eached whales. Not a pretty sight!

    Thanks for the kind words.

  3. Jeff Cantor says:

    A great read! I really like the way Paul always talks about the specific music he is listening to when he describes the sound. This makes the review much easier to relate to.

  4. Ron says:

    This review was great, Paul’s style is very unusual it stay’s with you long after you stop reading the story. Very entertaining, and informative and very what’s happening in or audio world, keep it going!

  5. packfill says:

    I am familiar with this unit and it sounds great. Proof that you don’t need to spend megabucks to get an excellent digital product.

  6. BP says:

    “Concise to the point and at the same time entertaining review I gotta check this one out……….BP”

    – Site Manager’s Note: – The original post for this comment was lost to the ether – it has been reposted by the Site Manager

  7. fritz says:

    hi all,

    i own the pureDAC since january 2014.

    despite endless tests i’m not able to play _my_ DSD128 files.

    these are digitized with a KORG MR1000 recorder from vinyl source.

    other DSD files (from internet) play normally.

    on the other hand _my_ (korg) files play well with other DAC’s

    has somebody knowledge about differences in the structure of DSD ?

    thanks in advance

    fritz
    (-:fs)

    • Paul Mah says:

      Hi Fritz,

      At the time of my audition with the PureDac I was just starting out with DSD files; so I only had a few DS64 files which worked fine.

      If DSD128 or double DSD files work with other DACs you have tried, I suspect the problem might be the driver software of the PureDac. I assume DSD64 files work correctly since you only mentioned that DSD128 is not working. The structure should be the same regardless of the sampling rate. I suggest you contact B.M.C. directly on their website if you haven’t already. Good luck!

      Paul Mah

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Popups Powered By : XYZScripts.com