Publisher Profile

PureAudioProject Trio15 Voxativ open baffle speakers Review

By: |

Compared to the Deadalus Ulysses

A fairer comparison is to a full range floor standing dynamic speaker such as the Daedalus Ulysses. After years of ownership, I determined to sell my set to a man who has become a member of our local audio club, whom you know as the man mentioned above as the buyer of the Exogal Comet and Ion. I heard the Ulysses just this past week with the Exogal pair, and the Ulysses played more brilliantly than ever. Chalk up another speaker taken to its best performance by the Exogal pairing. The Trio15 Voxativ is more fairly compared to the Ulysses, and in that comparison it stands as a strongly recommendable alternative to the standard multi-way dynamic speaker.

The Trio15 Voxativ is as capable of rich, organic hues as the Ulysses and reaches more deeply in the low frequencies. Lacking the cabinet coloration of the Ulysses, it presents an overall tighter and more effortless bass, with a seamlessness from the Mid-bass on up that the Ulysses cannot match. If everything hangs on the central part of the soundstage for you as a listener, for instance the vocals and instrumental solos, then the Trio15 Voxativ is the superior choice. More attention must be paid with the Voxativ driver to dial in the right amount of warmth, but once achieved through judicious use of cabling, it captures an ease of listening not dissimilar to the Ulysses. When driven hard, especially with overloaded LF, the twin Neo15” bass drivers of the Trio15 Voxativ will sound less stressed than the twin 8” bass drivers of the Ulysses. The cleanness of the upper end between the two speakers seems on a par, which is a complement to the Trio15 Voxativ as the crossover used in the Ulysses is high grade. This shows the quality of the componentry selected for the Trio15 Voxativ to compare favorably with at least this custom floor standing speaker.

 

Open baffle, non-panel

Most open baffle speakers are panel speakers; few are the open baffle dynamic speakers. Fans of panel speakers think they are hitting the transparent sound jackpot by using a hybrid electrostatic or magnetic planar technology. They presume there are no designs capable of more openness and transparency. The Trio15 Voxativ shows that thinking to be wrong. Though the wave launch is fundamentally different, with the right driver a full range hybrid such as the Trio15 Voxativ is potentially even clearer sounding!

The greatest difference is the perceived scale of the performers. A panel speaker presents the size of the performers grandly, making it seem as though there is far more information striking the ears. However, even though the Voxativ driver as a point source makes a more localized center image (think bulls eye, with intensity increasing toward the center), when one listens closely a prodigious amount of information can be heard. In addition, with magnetic planar speakers in particular the “Mylar sound” becomes evident. Unless one has an extremely powerful amp magnetic planar speakers tend to inhibit macrodynamics, splay treble and create acoustic images so large (i.e. piano or guitar) that the edges tend to push into each other in a way that causes the ear to lose the outer boundaries of the imaging. With the exception of bass impact it is a “go big or go home” proposition.

Moving from the Magnepan 1.7i, on review, to the Trio15 Voxativ one notices quickly the improvement in transparency looking into the sound field. How can that be? Aren’t magnetic planar speakers supremely good at transparency? Actually, not so much the lower end ones. I interject that I am not bashing Magnepan, as the same affect is noted with the Eminent Technology LFT-8B. With upper end models much of the haze is lost, but the 1.7i when compared to the Voxativ full range is evidently less clear. The Tang Band version of the PureAudioProject speaker is closer to the 1.7i’s transparency level.

This was perhaps the most surprising discovery about the Trio15 Voxativ. For many years I championed the perspective that one cannot find a more transparent speaker technology than found in panel speakers. Over the years I have experienced that an extreme dynamic speaker such as the Vapor Audio Joule White 3 has as much precision, transparency and speed as even the Kingsound King III electrostatic speaker. However, I would not have predicted the much more humbly priced Trio15 Voxativ to better any panel in terms of transparency.

 

Verastarr aftermarket “internal” cable set on the horizon

The Achilles heel of the speaker is plainly the “internal” cables routed from the Leonidas crossover to each driver. PureAudioProject has provided a lot of sound quality for the owner at a reasonable price by avoidance of a fancy, expensive cabinet, and inclusion of the user-assembled crossover with modest wiring. Thankfully, the unterminated wiring is easily exchanged, as there are no solder joints for it on either the crossover board or speaker driver terminals. This is wonderfully helpful, as upgrading this wiring is fundamental to improving the speaker’s sound.

If you wish to read an extended discussion of the importance of the internal cabling used in speakers, then peruse my review of the aforementioned Legacy Audio Whisper DSW Clarity Edition, wherein I discuss comparison of the speaker before and after Legacy Audio upgrading the speaker to 10 Ga. Clarity Cable internal wiring and Clarity Caps (no relation to Clarity Cable). It is understandable how speaker companies decide to build using inexpensive wires. It usually comes down to a combination of the chief designer’s disbelief that those wires make that much of a difference, and the cost reduction in building the speaker to hit a price point. My assessment is that opting for an inexpensive internal cable harms the speaker’s sound and does the speaker manufacturer no favors. Increasingly speaker makers are paying more attention to internal wiring.

In the case of the Trio15 series PureAudioProject knows that enthusiasts will seek their own flavor of replacement wiring, so why put in custom wire? The provided stranded and braided wiring is the equivalent of a stock 15A IEC power cord, which knowledgeable audiophiles consign to the shipping box forever and replace with an aftermarket power cord. Though I am reporting on the stock speaker’s sound, I will be happy to update the review in time as it is retrofitted with Verastarr’s new series of cables suitable for such purposes, available sometime in 2017. I expect nothing less than a transformation of the Trio15 Voxativ! Take my assessment of the speaker as it comes from the manufacturer described in this review as a baseline anticipating future improvement, because most aftermarket cabling, including the brands I have reviewed for Dagogo, will dramatically improve the Trio15 Voxativ across the board. For the Trio15 Voxativ to perform so admirably with the basic wiring is a testament to the quality of the other elements of the speaker.

 

Critical aspects of performance; toe-in and baffle slope

To elicit the magic of the Trio15 Voxativ one has to be quite particular with placement of the speakers. As might be expected, the further away they are, the more vast and relaxed they sound, however. at the expense of a proportionate degree of macrodynamic impact and image density. With the 15” bass drivers this is not a particularly problematic issue; just turn up the volume. It is the toe in and baffle slope that allows locking in on the perfect scene. As a projector gains focus and the image is crystalized before you, so when the toe in and baffle slope reach their optimum positioning the audible image is resolved.

Most of the review period I placed the speakers closer together than typical, i.e. well under the 8’ span I normally use between speakers, but flared out the front baffles more than usual. This ensures the tightness and consistency of the acoustic landscape the speaker creates. Everyone finds their own spacing and toe in to suit their taste. I ended up with the speakers 7’ from each other and positioned more widely of the respective ear than other, more traditional dynamic speakers.

The Trio15 line of speakers come with smallish adjustable spikes that are well made and aesthetically pleasing, but in my experience insufficient to rake back the baffle to the degree necessary to elevate the sound field and center image to my taste. I use a far more aggressive baffle angle than the speaker normally allows – I put risers approximately 5/8” thick under the front spikes. Upon occasion I have even used hockey pucks. Oh, how awful, how un-audiophile! I have said many times over the years I am about results and performance, not status quo or maintaining appearances. The truth is that many devices and tweaks in audiophilia are overpriced and underperform. A dense rubber hockey puck is among the most useful and sensible items any audiophile can own. I use them under main speakers and subwoofers when appropriate. I only wish there were half width hockey pucks to allow more incremental elevation of transducers, but the adjustable spikes usually accommodate, or the spikes can be removed entirely.

Does this messing with hockey pucks harm the sound? Perhaps slightly, but who wants to do the blind testing? In my experience such testing, i.e. placement of a more audiophile approved object under the speakers versus hockey pucks would not pass my Law of Efficacy, that is, there would not be an immediate beneficial change noted. I have conducted similar tests and find tweaks to be an insipid way to drive system performance forward. Consequently, I am unafraid to use something like a hockey puck to achieve a far more important goal, the seismic shift of a soundstage. That is a fundamental change to a speaker system’s performance and one that should not be overlooked.

The method to the madness lies in the fact that the Trio15 Voxativ is a speaker of average floor standing height and the full range driver is not elevated as high as some much larger speakers. In this matter even an inch or two elevation of the soundstage is very significant. Look at the YG Acoustics Sonja, which vaults the midrange and tweeter drivers as if launched into space! They have to be fired downward to achieve anything like a convincingly realistic performance. Part of the secret to their popularity is their height, as is the case with a large proportion of big gun, big-ticket speakers. I often replicate that effect with huge speakers by placing shims under their back footers to tilt the speakers ever so slightly forward, bringing down the soundstage to very pleasing effect. What if your speaker is smaller or the primary drivers located more earthward? Jack it up! Put something under the front feet and lift the soundstage, or place the entire speaker on a pedestal. It is one of the most simple and profoundly beneficial moves an audiophile can make to elevate (pardon the pun) the performance!

The most noticeable outcome apart from the shifting of the soundstage is the complete homogenization of the frequency spectrum. I am a tall listener at 6’ 5”, so the Voxativ driver sits well below my ears. That is why I lift the front of the speaker. If you are not vertically enhanced as I am, then you may have no need to match the vector of the Voxativ to your ears. But whatever baffle correction is necessary, you may wish to do so because the result is a precipitating event, the final saturation point at which the Voxativ driver shows all its glorious beauty. In an effect similar to what is heard in a D’Apollito array, the twin bass drivers and full range Voxativ AC-1.6 merge, or mesh, far better sonically than when they are not heard on the same acoustic plane. The Voxativ driver is much better when oriented on the same plane as one’s ears, much the same way that Sanders electrostatic speakers are preferred placed on axis to the respective ear.

Play with the speaker’s baffle slope; if you don’t like it you can return it to the “factory setting” in minutes.

 

A great sequel

On this lazy Sunday afternoon I wasted two hours taking in Independence Day Resurgence. Some sequels should never be made, and Resurgence was like a burger cooked twice on a grill with a dry, hard bun. Was there anything original in the movie? Rehashed actors, plot and effects – yawn. It should have been named Independence Day Regurgitation.

Is the Trio15 Voxativ a regurgitated speaker? To the untrained ear it would seem so. Those looking at the pictures of the Tang Band and Voxativ drivers at the website would be tempted to not reach for the more expensive version, mistakenly thinking they could get the Tang Band to the same level of performance. No, you can’t. The Voxativ reaches levels of performance the Tang Band will not. Though the recipe is similar, one is more corner café and the other gourmet.

Having extensive experience with both setups the appropriate recommendation is that potential owners opt for the Tang Band version only if the Voxativ is a fiscal impossibility. Once you have acquired the Trio15 Voxativ, keep saving some money aside because PureAudioProject has at least one more trick up their sleeve for the Trio15 series that I will be assessing in a future article. Your options with the speaker keep expanding! Will it ever end with PureAudioProject? I hope not!

 

Associated Components:

Source: Salk Audio StreamPlayer Generation III with ROON interface
Streaming Music Service: Tidal
Playback Software: ROON
DAC: Eastern Electric Minimax DSD DAC Supreme with Burson, Dexa NewClassD and Sparkos Labs Discrete Opamp Upgrade; Exogal Comet DAC and upgrade power supply, LampizatOr Big 7
Preamp: TEO Audio Liquid Preamplifier; VAC Renaissance Signature Preamplifier MkIICambridge Audio 840E
Amps: Red Dragon S500; VAC Phi 200; First Watt J2 (two)
SpeakersKings Audio Kingsound King III; Legacy Audio DSW Clarity Edition; Kings Audio King Tower omnidirectional; Vapor Audio Joule White 3; PureAudioProject Trio15 TB (Tang Band) and Treo15 Voxativ
Subwoofers: Legacy Audio XTREME HD (2)
IC’s: TEO Liquid Splash-Rs and Splash-Rc; TEO Liquid Standard MkII; Clarity Cable Organic RCA/XLR; Snake River Audio Signature Series Interconnects; Silent Source “The Music Reference”
Speaker Cables: TEO  Cable Standard Speaker; Clarity Cable Organic Speaker; Snake River Audio Signature Series Speaker Cables; Silent Source “The Music Reference”
Digital Cables: Clarity Cable Organic Digital; Snake River Audio Boomslang; Silent Source “The Music Reference”
USB: Verastarr Nemesis; Clarity Organic
Power Cables: Verastarr Grand Illusion; Clarity Cable Vortex; MIT Oracle ZIII; Xindak PF-Gold; Snake River Audio Signature Series; Silent Source “The Music Reference”
Power Conditioning: Wireworld Matrix Power Cord Extender; Tice Audio Solo
Copy editor: Dan Rubin

20 Responses to PureAudioProject Trio15 Voxativ open baffle speakers Review


  1. Riccardo says:

    Hi and thank you for the great review. I am in the process to upgrade from 1.7i to 3.7i although it will probably move from the current Karan Acoustics I-180 to dedicated monoblocks. Your comment about lower end of the Magnepan line let me hope I am going in the right direction. Or should I consider the Voxativ a better option? My source is hires digital via tube dac and I almost exclusively play any subgenre of classical music. I will very appreciate your candide answer. R

  2. AMF says:

    Great report, Doug. It would be great to see pictures of the crossover and construction details.

  3. AMF says:

    Never mind, I saw your February 2016 report

  4. Jerry says:

    I have the Trio 15 Voxative on order. Ze’ev indicated the value of the single film cap was 68. Please identify the Clarity Caps you used and their values.

  5. Gary Anderson says:

    I have the PAP Voxativ

    Mike Powell of Verastarr has been leading the way on tweaks and upgrade pathes for my speakers and for his very own PAP V speakers.

    Brand new shoes to walk with under the speaker. (Footers)

    Crossover off the fame and on Audio Points. Clarity Caps.
    Verastarr’s own custom made ribbon foils from crossover to speakers. I would say with the stock wire that is used for the crossover to speakers is not to be compared to the Verastarr ribbons as it is not even a close fight with Verrastar taking the speaker up in SQ by +30%!!!! The speaker as stock is the best speaker I have owned!! Verastarr has unleashed the incredible potential locked up in these speakers.

    In stock form I would agree with this review as being spot on. The upgrade path for this design is what makes being an Audiophile so much fun!!!

    The team at PAP is the best one could want in customer service. Mike Powell from Verastarr is always pursuing new designs for better SQ and he also is one of the best designers I have had the pleasure to deal with!!!

    Regards,
    Gary

  6. Jerry,
    God’s Peace,
    I believe you will thoroughly enjoy the Voxativ version.
    I had desire to use the Clarity Caps but have not done so at this point.

    Blessings,
    Douglas Schroeder

  7. Jerry says:

    Gary,

    Great info, I was wondering if anyone had taken this speaker under there wing for tweeks, new wiring, crossovers and isolation. But I am really anxious to know which clarity caps and in what values or do I need to contact Verastarr?

    Best,
    Jerry

  8. Gary,
    God’s Joy to you,

    Thank you for the vote of confidence regarding the accuracy of the review!
    I will be working with Verastarr cabling with the PAP in the future.

    Blessings,
    Douglas Schroeder

  9. SM says:

    Hi Doug,

    Congratulations on writing this excellent review. I’ve few questions.

    1) If someone mostly prefers (80%) rock/electronic/indie/modern music and the remaining is vocal/ acoustics/R&B/soul – which one would you think would be more suitable PAP Tang Band, PAP Voxativ and Daedalus Ulysses? Assuming, money is not a concern and listening is done in a moderate volume.

    2) I use T+A Dac8 DSD and upsample everything to DSD 512 using HQPlayer. I think it makes a significant difference. And hence, it won’t be possible for me to switch to Exogal combo. What other amp do you think would be a good match with the PAP Voxativ/TB given my music choice?

    Did you get to use your Vac Phi 200 amp with you PAP? How was your impression? Solid State (Class A/AB/D) vs Tube – which one would be more suitable for listening to modern music with moderate volume? I value dynamics/grunt but also refinement. I currently have a Rogue ST 100 amp was wondering if it’d be a good match with PAP Voxativ.

    3) Do you think a listening room of 15’x12′ would be suitable for PAP Voxativ?

    Thank you,
    SM

  10. SM,
    God’s Peace to you,

    Thanks for your complement!
    I am pressed for time, however, I can say this answer to your numbered questions:
    1. the Voxativ – it is the most beautiful and actually more capable in clean low end than the Daedalus
    2. If you wish to go with a Class D amp the Red Dragon S500 is quite good, as well as the Legacy Audio Powerbloc2; the Powerbloc2 is a bit warmer. You may also wish to read up on my review of the First Watt J2, which sounds very good with the Voxativ, however not as much dynamic impact as with more powerful SS amp. I didn’t have much experience with the VAC and PAP, however, I think it would be a good match.
    Try your Rogue amp; you may love it. However, there are always many options/upgrades and the PAP will reveal all amp changes.
    4. Your room should be ok. You can always put some sound panels behind the speakers if you wish.

    Blessings,
    Douglas Schroeder

  11. Gerry E. says:

    Hi Doug:

    I’m using custom Trio 15s with vintage ALTEC 756Bs and Jensen RP302s. I found your review very interesting, especially the part about placement. A few questions related to that:

    1. Is the 7′ distance between speakers from the inside-edges or centers?

    2. How far are you sitting from the speakers? Also, what is the distance between the speakers and the wall behind them?

    3. Last, are you saying you are using a toe-in angle that is less than usual due to the shorter distance between the speakers?

    For comparison, I’m using my pair in a large basement listening room. The distance between them is 8 feet (edge to edge). There’s approx. 44″ between the speakers and the wall behind them. Last, the sweet spot is about 10.5′ from the speakers.

    I totally agree with you that optimizing image height is critical for best sound. I have my pair sitting atop 3″ high maple cutting boards. I’m also using two stock spikes in front so that they are tilted back as much as possible.

    Thanks!

    Gerry E.

  12. Gerry,
    God’s Joy to you,

    I appreciate the warm and thoughtful reply!

    I actually have that system taken down now and I’m working on other reviews, so this is my recollection; The 7′ foot measurement would be from driver to driver, and I sit in that configuration about 10′ away from them. The distance from the head wall to speakers is about 6′. The toe in angle is not due to the shorter distance between speakers, but rather due to the nature of the single driver, in order to open up the center image more.

    Your placement is not out of line, but if you wish and have the room you can certainly try some rather different relationships between the listening seat, width and toe in.

    One must be cautious the center of balance and stability of the speaker is not pushed too far. Other than that, the raking back of the grill is wonderful!

    Blessings,
    Douglas Schroeder

  13. Mike Bernstein says:

    Nice review Douglas! I was curious if you compared this with Vapor Joule (I know it is apples to oranges) and provide your thoughts? I have heard Nimbus -they were good.

  14. Mike,
    The Joy of the Lord to you,

    I appreciate the appreciation!

    I did not do direct comparison as the speakers are in vastly different categories in every respect. However, I have had occasion to handle both in several systems. Predominantly the cabinet of the Joule White 3, while quite inert does impart the classic “box” sound as would be expected versus the open baffle design of the Tre015 Voxativ.

    The Voxativ cannot be beat in terms of coherence, as might be expected in a comparison between a 3-way and hybrid single driver setup. The edge in terms of absolute cleanness and detail retrieval would go to the Joule White 3. The sense of ease in bass extension would be won by the Voxativ, as might be expected with twin 15″ drivers per channel. However, the overall most pleasing nature of the bass would likely be a draw given the beauty of both.

    I suggest both are marvelous examples of good design and execution for their price points, otherwise I wouldn’t be using them! One last remark; when Ryan Scott delivered the Joule White 3 at that time I was using the Nimbus and struggled to relinquish it in partial payment for the Joule White 3. Ryan reassured me that the Joule White 3 was far superior and I would come to love it. He was right; I do appreciate the tighter performance of the Joule White 3 and likely would not go back to the Nimbus if given the chance. Most other 3-way speakers at the price I would likely return to the Nimbus. If I add subs to the Joule White 3 I get the foundation of the Nimbus, but with the holistic performance of the richer model.

    Blessings,
    Douglas Schroeder

  15. Bill Baker says:

    Greetings Douglas,
    It is nice to see a review of this speaker as I have been looking at their design concept for some time with great interest. With the return of Purity Audio Design, I believe these speakers can be built and customized, especially the crossover, in a way that they can become a reference in one of my test systems. I even have some copper foil wiring set aside to be used to wire up the drivers when I decide on my next reference speaker. I will continue researching this line before making any final decisions.
    Thanks again for reviewing these speakers and happy to see you’re still involved in this great industry.

  16. Mike Bernstein says:

    Thank you Douglas for taking time to reply- appreciate this!

    Mike

  17. Bill,
    God’s Joy,

    Lovely to hear from you! I’m sure that with your special TLC the speakers could become a lovely reference for you. I would find it interesting to see what you have planned for them. Feel free to contact me via my Dagogo email address and let me know what the plans are for the speakers, should you go that route. I appreciate your support of my reviewing.

    Blessings,
    Douglas Schroeder

  18. Shama says:

    This brought back some memories of a “Speaker Builder” journal series by Warren Hunt & Joseph Janni called ‘A Full Range Open Baffle System’ published back in 1994 – 96. This implementation is a natural outcome built on their & others work. Love the wide range Voxativ application. Keep the Faith.
    Carefully Hear
    Carefully Consider
    Carefully Live

  19. Paul Letteri says:

    Doug Great review, I sold my new Marten Logan 11-a,4 months old based on Dougs review,
    My brother is a critic ,but he was very impressed considering the Xover parts were only 24 hours old
    As well as the Verastarr wire which is exceptional,I now use Verastarr throughout my system a realism
    Not found before ,the power cord alone took my digital to new heights. Getting back to my speakers
    I have been modding xovers for years my new average spend is a great capacitor for the Leonitus Xover 1-68uf Clarity CSA,,And Fostex Copper,tin foil,2.2uf as a big bypass for flavor soldered together
    For $250 Madisound carries and get them close matched 1%. Magical compared with the average white Mundorf cap. The feet too need to be addressed a bunch oh hockey pucks. ,spikes are better elevate the front 2 inches if possible . Doug makes many fine points and a Big Thank you .i owned a Hifi store.K for years before coming back home .for shear enjoyment for about $7k
    With capacitor upgrade, and Verastarr wire harness. I have yet to find a more you are there presentation .i have had 5speakers in 4 years several over $10k 1 $22k ,none the equal .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Popups Powered By : XYZScripts.com