Publisher Profile

Pass Laboratories HPA-1 headphone amplifier Review

By: |

I can count on one hand the number of manufacturers who build solidly engineered products that are ahead of the curve and herd, whose products remain vastly competitive and superior to others, and price increase is as rare as hen’s teeth. I can also name companies pricing their products to the stratosphere and tout more sensibly priced new products as breakthroughs. In an industry where forces of aggressive, upward pricing actions sometimes congregate and form a trend, companies run by a firm hand in creating high value-to-price products instead need to be recognized. They are the silent disruptors of the status quo.

Case in point, a few of the headphone amplifications I have auditioned featured patented designs with names befitting a megabuck powerhouse, and one with commensurate pricing to boot. I had high hopes in anticipation for their arrival, but they didn’t sound special enough in the end to warrant an official Review. In other words, I found nothing noteworthy about them compared with what I’m using, namely the $3,500 Pass Laboratories HPA-1.

My reviews of Pass Laboratories amplifications have shown them to feature meticulously researched and proven technologies. Combined with expert manufacturing techniques and restrained pricing, their products are often best-in-class in performance and value. I auditioned their ex-gen $3,800 entry-level single chassis XP-15 Phono preamp and the $10,600 XP-25 two-chassis Phono preamp concurrently, and though each was already more expensive than some in their class which were laden with features and lofty specifications, I found the XP-15 and XP-25 to be superior in performance and ruggedness, hence my reference in their respective class for over three years.

In 2015, when Pass Laboratories launched a new series of linestages beginning with the XP-12, it was and remains to this day as the company’s entry-level preamplifier that bears the prominent marque, albeit retailing for a princely sum of $5,800. Pass Labs president Desmond Harrington once told me that the company only releases products that can perform competently even in the most demanding of systems. I have not auditioned it, and undoubtedly it is as good as the company intends, but another product from Pass Laboratories may have become the company’s de facto lowest priced preamplifier.

The $3,500 HPA-1, or High Bias Headphone Amplifier as described in the owner’s manual, not only features two pairs of RCA headphone inputs, namely INPUT 1 and INPUT 2, there’s also a pair of RCA outputs named PREAMP. Inside the compact chassis is a low feedback, wide bandwidth discrete circuit, J-Fet input stage, class A biased direct coupled Mosfet output stage, custom low noise shielded toroidal power transformer with Faraday shield and discrete, on top of a regulated power supply for audio circuits. There is serious First Watt DNA in a Pass Labs platform. Prestige and performance. Exciting.

Relaying Aurender signals alternately from the $8,500 Bricasti Design M1 dual-mono DAC and the equally priced Audio Research DAC9 tube to the $42,000 Pass Labs XA200.8 class A monoblocks, driving a pair of the $25,000 Sound Labs Majestic 645 electrostatic panels, the HPA-1 was audibly less dynamic and three-dimensional than the $38,000 Xs Preamp that it replaced. Yet, the half-sized headphone amp/linestage was steadfast in inducing the big panels to churn out globs of atmospheric ambience cues amidst demonstration-class spectral extensions. The HPA-1 may not be the most accurate linestage particularly in the presence of the stately Xs Preamp, nonetheless, the purity of sound that it relays simply cannot be overstated. For readers not using ultra sensitive uber priced speakers, the HPA-1 is good enough and all you need to spend your money on.

The most noticeable feature on the HPA-1 is the large ALPS Potentiometer audio taper volume knob, commandeered directly from the volume control in the company’s last generation, $10,000 XP-30 linestage’s auxiliary outputs. Turning the shiny, big round VOLUME knob was sheer joy as its continuous tracking provides just enough user feedback to make me want to fiddle with it to no end. I have never felt so much satisfaction in operating a VOLUME control. Tiny volume pots need not apply henceforth. The HPA-1 doesn’t have a remote unit but so what? With the two INPUTs arguably being the only justification for the convenience of a remote in exchange for a potentially significant increase in price, the HPA-1 is kept less expensive sans remote, and I applaud that design decision.

Whilst my Xs Preamp reveals the superiority of the Esoteric SACD player over the otherwise peerless Aurender N100SC caching music-server and streamer, the HPA-1 falls far short on that but this is not a fair comparison. There is enormous finesse to be had for the $3,300 Aurender, and comparing it to the $21,000 Esoteric K-01XD is unfair as well, but this exercise illustrates the tremendous value both the Aurender and the Pass Labs HPA-1 are.

I also auditioned the HPA-1 with the $4,000 Focal Utopia headphones and I found its spacious recreation of the venue and vivid retrieval of the fine details in the recording to be the superior attributes of the design. The Pass Labs owner’s manual claims the headphone amplifier is of such statue that it drives planar headphones with ease. I put on my discontinued Oppo PM-1 electrostatic, and the Audeze LCD-X, and sure enough the stability of the HPA-1 translated into a superior sense of extensions and vividness, more so than when driven by other headphone amps I auditioned. The HPA-1 actually made my Focal Utopia sounded smoother and more spectacular than one headphone amp nearly four times its price. In this case, the Pass Labs actually induced none of the fatiguing spectral spikes masquerading as sonic candies from the pricier model.

I have auditioned quite a few headphone amplifiers solid-state and tube, and none could surpass the HPA-1’s stability and drive by a large margin, owing assuredly and additionally to the use of Neutrik locking headphone connector for an isolated signal ground connection, plus the use of internal silver contact rated to carry ten amperes of current without overheating. Again, guess what other companies would’ve charged for all that?

A quibble I had with the unit concern the omission of balanced connections. Desmond offers the following: ‘Some of the Alephs (Pass Labs products of early 2000) were single-ended only and the (current) XA25 stereo power amplifier is single-ended only. The choice of single-ended only on the HPA-1 was for size. True balanced takes twice the space and we wanted to keep the HPA-1 small and simple.’ Though small and simple by Desmond’s standard, its chassis is none other than the same signature, Pass Laboratories brushed aluminum, found in all of the company’s preamplifiers and amplifiers.

This lowly, junior member of the Pass Labs family is a tour de force through and through, and would be another company’s pride and joy, as well as a much costlier flagship. Scantily few companies have the resources, energy and forte in creating a creature like the HPA-1. The HPA-1 is about applying Pass Laboratories’ engineering and manufacturing might with the management of Desmond Harrington, and with a keen eye on stringent component selection, quality control and a healthy dose of restrained pricing.

History of Pass Labs repeats, and customers get more than what they pay for. The HPA-1 is priced as a headphone amplifier but it gives so much more. Every Pass Laboratories’ products are so very unique and differing even among themselves that, in my opinion, it is indicative of a fresh and start-over design approach on each and every product. As both a super headphone amplifier and a reference-caliber linestage retailing for $3,500, the HPA-1 is the most out-of-this-world design to come from Nelson Pass and his team. It makes for serious fun. Unequivocally recommended.

By the way, Pass Laboratories has not raised its prices since September, 2015. Run.

Copy editor: Dan Rubin

  • (Page 1 of 1)

2 Responses to Pass Laboratories HPA-1 headphone amplifier Review


  1. JDH says:

    Constantine,

    I have owned the HPA-1 since May 2021. I want to share my experience for anyone looking for another perspective. I have been using the unit daily, primarily with Dan Clark Audio’s (formerly Mr. Speakers) Ether C headphone, a closed back planar magnetic design. My source has been almost exclusively a Luxman d-03x CD Player playing redbook CDs.

    For me, the most impressive quality of this amp is its ability to convey soundstage depth through headphones. My past experience thinking about headphone spatial qualities has been imagining a left-right soundstage. With this amp I can (it’s headphones, so of course it’s not like speakers) see into the performance more than I have with other, less costly, equipment. A defining moment for me in appreciating this was when I was hearing Andras Schiff’s recording of Brahm’s 1st piano concerto, MVMT II, Adagio (ECM 2021) through the Pass HPA-1. The Adagio, which evokes a heavenly peace, ends with a serene timpani roll adding a sense of weight to final moments of reverie while also foreshadowing the percussive piano staccato of the third movement. Through the HPA-1, I could appreciate not only the position of the timpani in the hall, but also the air surrounding the timpani. Similarly, when listening to the track “Empathy” off of Art Hirahara’s Open Sky (PosiTone 2021) the upright bass was placed firmly behind the piano, giving me an exciting sense of depth and dimension to my listening.

    This bloom-like quality of the HPA-1 helps me appreciate low level detail in a very natural way. Although transients don’t feel overly fast, the spatial presentation allows the HPA-1 to be very revealing without being fatiguing.

    Consistently, the HPA-1 is transparent to the source I use. When using my Luxman d-03x CD player, I appreciate its merits of rhythmic drive and warmth as well as its tonal integrity. While the Luxman presents a gripping and exciting low end with the HPA-1, the top end is silky bordering syrupy, which is my one dissatisfaction with using the Luxman as a source with the HPA-1. When I switch to using my Questyle QP2R digital audio player as a source, I notice a significant thinning of the sound, less rhythmic drive, and less natural timbers. However, the QP2R is able to highlight low level detail and lateral spatial information a little more than the Luxman in some recordings and the top end is more open during moments when the Luxman felt syrupy. I was using the single ended output of the Luxman to make these comparisons as the HPA-1 only accepts single ended inputs.

    I have been using to the HPA-1 as a preamp with my active loudspeakers, namely the Unity Audio Super Rocks, which are studio monitors for my home recording projects, and have not felt there to be any compromise in performance when the HPA-1 is used as a preamp. This is consistent with others observations that the HPA-1 is as much a preamp as a headphone amp and as much a headphone amp as a preamp. Since I don’t have another preamp to compare it to, I will hold off on writing more about my impressions, but considering the cost of admission I think this is a great choice for someone looking for a piece that can serve as both a headphone amp and a preamp.

    I am very happy with the HPA-1. Using it both as a preamp and a headphone amp, the HPA-1 has become a part of my daily life. The dimensional and tonal integrity of this amp has helped me get into headphones in an exciting new way.

  2. Suso says:

    Hi, this is all fine and nice. I don’t doubt that the device has good specs, sounds fine, measures well and has good built quality and so on. But, there are since a few years chinese products, that measure absuredly well, have almost instrument like, transparent qualities, like the SMSL SH-8s or the Topping A30, which cost about $200-300. Also we have the Drop and Monoprice THX ones for about $300-400. They for sure measure and sound not worse than this Pass Lab one. Build quality and Design for sure is different, but if this justifies a $3000 price increase is for everybody to decide.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Popups Powered By : XYZScripts.com