Publisher Profile

Teresonic Ingenium Floorstanding Speaker Review

Laurence A. Borden & the horn tower of Teresonic Ingenium

By: |

Teresonic Ingenium Floorstanding SpeakersIn The Beginning

Let me begin with what is now an oft-told tale. In the early days of audio, amplifiers were tube-based and of low power. The speakers they powered were, by necessity, of high efficiency/sensitivity, often incorporating horns. The introduction of the transistor dramatically changed the landscape as it became possible to obtain higher power, and to do so relatively inexpensively. With the availability of higher powered amps, speaker designers no longer had to be concerned with efficiency. Horns were slowly replaced by conventional dynamic driver designs, which used multiple drivers and more complex crossovers. The popularity of this approach is apparent from a quick visit to most any high-end audio store, and by the success of brands such as B&W, Thiel, Wilson, etc.

However, as time passed, an increasing number of audiophiles became disappointed with this supposed advance. While the new breed of speakers and amps had greater frequency range and lower distortion than earlier designs, many listeners found that the former lacked the ability to communicate the emotional content of the music. Thus began – – first in Japan and later in the United States and Europe — a resurgence of simplicity, as manifested by single-ended triode (“SET”) amps and high efficiency speakers. The subject of this review, the Teresonic Ingenium loudspeaker, is a high efficiency speaker utilizing a single driver (and thus no cross-over).

The Speakers
Teresonic is a relatively new company which, presently, sells only direct to the consumer. Their product line comprises two models, the smaller Integrum and the larger Ingenium, each of which utilizes a single Lowther driver. The Ingenium review samples come standard with a Lowther DX3 driver, though the DX4 is available for additional cost. While Lowthers are typically described as being full-range drivers, they are not actually so in the sense that they do not cover the entire range from 20 to 20,000 Hz. Accordingly, one must utilize an appropriate cabinet to increase their output, especially at the lower frequencies. Teresonic uses a modified transmission line design which they refer to as ETQWT™ (Enhanced Tapered Quarter Wave Transmission line), with Helmholtz resonators. Unlike many modern speakers which aim for an absence of cabinet resonance, the cabinet of the Ingenium is “tuned” like a musical instrument to introduce its own resonances and overtones, and to cancel out some unwanted peaks associated with the Lowther driver. As expected, rapping on the side reveals a resonant cabinet.

Teresonic Integrum

The Shortest Distance Between Two Points …

The original plan was for me to review the smaller Integrum. Once en route, Teresonic provided me with the tracking number so I would know when to expect delivery. When the speakers didn’t arrive as scheduled I contacted the courier and was assured that they would arrive the next day. To make a long story short, this episode repeated itself daily for almost two weeks, at which point the carrier acknowledged that one of the two packages was missing. After still more calls I learned that they had found the missing package but that it had been damaged. Back to the manufacturer they went. Mike Zivkovic at Teresonic quickly dispatched a brand new set of speakers to me, this time a pair of Ingeniums to make up for the aggravation (which of course, was not his fault). The Ingeniums arrived promptly. I was delighted to see and learn that Teresonic packs their speakers in specially constructed crates (one speaker per crate). How the carrier managed to damage one of them (in the first shipment) will remain one of life’s mysteries. Within the crates the speakers are further protected against scratches by a material sack, and the speaker wires come in beautiful wood boxes. All-in-all, packaging is handled extremely professionally.

Unfortunately, upon unpacking the speakers and setting them up, it was immediately apparent that one of the drivers was damaged as it emitted a terrible buzzing sound. Because of their very high tolerances, it is not uncommon for the Lowther’s voice coil to become misaligned. I tried to realign it (with the help of friend and audio dealer who is quite familiar with Lowthers), but the driver continued to misbehave, so Teresonic sent me a brand new matched pair of drivers. Kudos to Mike for keeping such a cool head during these mishaps. The drivers were easy to install, and have thankfully performed without incident. If this proves to be a recurring problem, the folks at Teresonic might want to consider shipping the Lowthers separately from the speakers and letting the customers install them.

Looks Do Count

I pride myself on choosing audio components for the way they sound, not the way they look. In fact, some of the best components I have owned have been rather mundane looking. That said, the Ingeniums are downright gorgeous, and it is difficult to not be smitten by them. The fit n’ finish is world class, and their shape is everything I am not –
– tall and slim, with beautiful flowing lines. I imagine they will win admiring glances in any setting. The front face is magnificent rosewood, while the sides are black.

The Ingeniums are 73” tall, 10” wide and 20” deep. They form a gentle “S” with the driver mounted approximately in the middle of the vertical axis, on the front convexity. The transmission line opens at the bottom front. The binding posts are on the back opposite the drivers; and are thus some distance from the floor. This geometry must be taken into account when calculating the required length of speaker wire. Speaking of speaker wire, I used both my reference Stealth Audio MLT hybrid wire, as well as Teresonic’s own Clarison speaker cables for this review. With a sensitivity of greater than 100 dB, the Ingeniums will of course be quite sensitive to extraneous noise. With both brands of speaker wire, I had only the slightest hiss through the speakers, which was inaudible from the seating position.

Positioning the speakers was a trade-off between bass response and soundstage depth. In their final position, the front face of the Lowther was 51” from the front wall, and 38” from the side wall. The centers of the speakers were approximately 8 feet apart, and I sat 8-10 feet away from the speakers (measured on the diagonal). I preferred them with no toe-in.

The Sound

As noted above, the review speakers had brand new Lowthers. If ever there was an audio component that required extensive break-in, it is the Lowther driver. Right out of the box, the sound was awful. As in dreadful. As in “what-the-heck-is wrong with these things?” Think thin and screechy. But with time, things changed dramatically, all for the better. As of this writing I have played them for a few hundred hours, and it is unlikely that the Lowthers are yet completely broken in. Anyone who buys these speakers should keep in mind the long break-in, lest you jump to an incorrect conclusion.

Considering that the Ingeniums use but a single driver and lack a cross-over, it is hardly surprising that their sonics reflect the characteristics of that driver, for better and for worse. The Ingenium’s strong points are considerable and can be summed up in a just a few words. Speed. Palpability. Coherence. Lowther drivers are praised the world over for their startling midrange, and the Ingeniums exhibit this property to its fullest. To listen to the Ingeniums is to be reminded of just how compromised many (most?) speakers are in the all-important midrange. Let’s start with speed.

Audiophiles often speak of dynamics, which refers to the range between the softest passage and the loudest. While frequency range of the speaker obviously has an impact, so does the ability of the speaker to respond quickly to dynamic changes. In fact, I feel that speed is arguably more important; given the choice, I would choose a fast speaker with limited frequency range over a fuller-range but slower one. In considering dynamics, it is useful to distinguish between macrodynamics and microdynamics. The former refers to the change in volume from a soft passage to a loud one, whereas the latter refers to the structure of an individual note: its rise, sustenance and decay. Whereas macrodynamics are more ear-catching, microdynamic structure is equally important to realistic musical reproduction. Far too many systems are simply too sluggish to properly reproduce a note. The Ingeniums, on the other hand, are lightning-fast. Be it the pluck of a string, the thwack of a stick, or the breath into a horn, the Ingeniums reproduce the sound with startling realism, imbuing the music with life and energy. By comparison, many other speakers seem dull and lifeless.

Which brings us to palpability and coherence. A problem facing any designer of multi-driver speakers is that of driver integration. Some designers succeed admirably; others fail miserably, while most fall between these two extremes. In the worst cases, the discontinuity between drivers is readily apparent due to different tonalities and/or dispersion. In the best of cases, it is barely noticeable – – until one listens to a single driver speaker such as the Ingenium. Through the Ingeniums, music is reproduced as a coherent whole, rather than as a bunch of pieces being fit together. We have all experienced live music in which the band is “tight.” We have similarly heard performances in which the various performers just didn’t seem to be on the same wavelength (pun intended). It is my belief that what accounts for this disparity relates to timing. When a band is tight, the musicians are playing in perfect unison, and often seem as though they can read each other’s minds. While I am loathe to make too strong a comparison between live music and that which is recorded and reproduced, I feel that the analogy is reasonable. Music played back through the Ingeniums is akin to hearing a tight band – – all the parts seem properly connected. In conjunction with their speed, this property made the music sound more life-like than with virtually any other speaker I have heard. High praise indeed! One could almost see the musicians smiling as they played off one another; some times harmonizing perfectly, other times intentionally slightly off beat, and still other times with perhaps a bit of one-upmanship. I cannot over-emphasize that this is not just about correct tonality, or harmonic lushness, but something far more intrinsic to the music. As with pornography, when you hear it, you know it. And once heard, one immediately understands why designers of crossover-less, single driver speakers are so adamant about the importance of this approach.

Of course, the Ingeniums allowed me to hear very deeply into the music. This was not the kind of treble highlighting that certain speakers display but rather, an incredible portrayal of the instrument’s harmonics. When listening in particular to string instruments, I had a greater sense of the body of the instrument than with most other speakers.

As mentioned above, Lowthers greatest strength is in the midrange. The human voice falls predominantly in this frequency range, and through the Ingeniums it is magnificent. Listening to well recorded vocal recordings through the Ingeniums was always a treat. They were at once dynamic, full-bodied, and vivid; truly a sublime experience.

The soundstage produced by the Ingeniums was of reasonable width and depth. Where the Ingeniums excelled was in the layering of the instruments. This was not the kind of phony imaging in which one can draw imaginary lines around the instruments. Rather, it was more a sense of each instrument occupying its own sonic space. This too added to the realism.

Are the Ingeniums perfect? Of course not, no speaker is. Their weaknesses are in two main areas. First, although Teresonic lists the specifications of the Integrum as 30Hz-22kHz ± 3dB, my ears tell me that the frequency response was considerably narrower in my room. (The transmission line is, I believe, tuned to 35 Hz.) The high frequencies did not the air and sparkle I am used to from, for example, my reference Horning Agathon Ultimates (which have a tweeter), nor did the bas go particularly low. The lack of high frequencies, while noticeable, did not bother me a great deal. (I believe that the output of the DX3 drops off dramatically above about 13,500 Hz.) Substitution of the DX3 by the DX4 should somewhat lessen this problem. The lack of lower frequency energy was more of a problem, making some recordings sounding a bit thin. While this is obviously highly room-dependent, purchasers of the Ingeniums should consider augmenting the bass with a subwoofer. I should point out that this is the case with other well-regarded single driver speakers, for example, those from Beauhorn, Cain & Cain, or Rethm.

The second problem is that despite the designer’s best efforts, the Ingeniums retained some of the “Lowther shout.” This manifests as an unpleasant peakiness, the degree of which varies with recording and type of music. This was somewhat ameliorated by use of the optional phase equalizer, which I used for most of my listening. Not surprisingly, the shout is more apparent with digital recordings than with those on vinyl, and with electronically amplified music – say, rock and roll- than with acoustic music such as blues and other small ensembles. In fairness, there are a number of caveats that must be mentioned.

First and perhaps most important, as mentioned above I doubt that the Lowthers are yet fully broken in. It is well known that as the drivers break in, the shout diminishes. Second, individuals differ considerably in their perception of and sensitivity to high frequency distortion; I happen to be exquisitely sensitive. Third, my amplifiers, the Tube Distinctions Soul monoblocks, which use parallel single-ended KT88s for the output, are quite revealing. Pairing the Ingeniums with a warmer sounding SET amp will undoubtedly diminish the shout, albeit at the expense of some clarity and frequency extension. Fourth, for pyschoacoustic reasons, increasing the bass with a subwoofer will tend to make the shout less apparent. As such, the shout I experienced should not be deemed a deal-breaker and in fact, may prove to be at most a minor weakness.

Concluding Remarks

Unlike woolen winter hats, when it comes to speakers, one size does not fit all. Much as we would like to pretend otherwise, no speaker does it all. Not only must one take into account the relative physical sizes of the speaker and room, other factors such as musical taste and sonic priorities must be considered. For example, while very large speakers such as the Nola Grand Exotica or the Dali Megalines excel at reproducing orchestral music in all their splendor, they are less adept at conveying the subtleties of softer musical pieces. In contrast, a speaker such as the venerable Quad 57 is amongst the best ever made in reproducing smaller ensembles, but is simply incapable of the larger SPLs and frequency range of more majestic pieces. The Ingeniums are closer to the Quad in this regard. They provide exquisite reproduction of vocals and acoustic music, be it folk, jazz or chamber. With such music, the realism they provide is uncanny, and superior to that of many speakers on the market.

The Ingeniums provide an emotional connection to the music that truly must be heard to be believed. On the other hand, because of their somewhat limited frequency range, and a bit of edginess as discussed above, they are less suited to electronic music such as hard rock. Fortunately, it is unlikely that those who prefer such music would opt for a single-driver speaker.

Their retail price of approximately $9,000 (not counting a subwoofer) is hardly insignificant, and many excellent speakers are available at this price point (or lower). That said, the Ingeniums bring to bear the great strengths of the Lowther driver in a stunning package, and will provide hours of listening pleasure for those whose tastes are aligned with their design goals. Now that they are on the way back to the manufacturer, I will most assuredly miss them.

Some of the Music Used in the Evaluation of the Teresonic Ingeniums
Clifford Jordan Quartet, :Live at Ethyl’s” (Mapleshade MS 56292)

Count Basie & His Orchestra, “88 Basie Street,” (JVCXR -0021-2)

Blues Guitars for the Homeless, “Strike a Deep Chord”
Ella Fitzgerald, “The Cole Porter Songbook, Volume One (Verve 821 989-2)

Jorma Kaukonen, “Blue Country Heart,” (Columbia 9699-86394-2 3)

Jimmy Raney, “Solo” (Prevue Classic records(CD PR 8; 6 01704-0008-2 4)

Corey Harris, “Fish Ain’t Bitin’ (ALCD 4850; 014551-4850-2 5)

Gregg Field, “The Art of Swing,” (Lauren Records DZS-172; 0 10963 01722 9)

Steve Earle, “Train a Comin’”(Winter Harvest WH 3302, 7 91337 33022 8)

Rubinstein, “The Chopin Ballads & Scherzos (Living Stereo SCAD, BMG 82876-61396-2)

Benny Goodman, Stompin’ at the Savoy” (BMG 7863-61067-2)

Allman Brothers Band, “Live at the Fillmore” (Capricon SD2-802)

Gene Krupa Quartet, Max Roach/Clifford Brown Quintet (JG 633)

The Tony Bennett Bill Evans Album (Fantasy F-9489)

Stevie Ray Vaughan & Double Trouble, “Texas Flood” (CBS 7464-38734-1)

The Who, “Who’s Next” (MCA-2023)

Traveling Wilburys Vol. 3 (Warner Brothers 07599-26324-1 06)

Blues Breakers, John Mayall and Eric Clapton (London Records LC50009)

John Lee Hooker, “The Folk Blues of John Lee Hooker” (Fantasy CH 282; 0 29617 12821 6)

Lightnin’ Hopkins, “Goin’ Away” (Analogue Productions APB014)

Bille Holiday, “Strange Fruit” (Atlantic 5D1614)

Bob Dylan, “Blonde on Blonde” (Columbia C2S841)

Derek and the Dominoes, “Layla” (RSO Records Rs-2-3801)

Led Zeppelin (Atlantic SD 8216)

Big Brother & the Holding Company, “Cheap Thrills” (Columbia PC 9700)

Manufacturer’s Comment:

Many Lowther fans have drivers that are already broken-in. We are pleased to announce that both Integrum and Ingenium models are now available with or without drivers. Email to for pricing.

Speaker break-in is a necessity for a number of reasons, but the bottom line is sonic improvement. The resonant frequency of the driver stabilizes at the specified value which is critical for proper functioning of the Teresonic design. Teresonic’s unique dual-tuned design actively contributes to the overall sonic experience unlike many other manufacturers who use cabinetry as a passive element housing multiple drivers. That’s also why the music instrument-like shape of Teresonic speakers is an essential design element. The aesthetics of the “…stunning package” doesn’t hurt either.

The resonant frequency of drivers out of the box is usually much higher than Lowther’s specified 36Hz, sometimes over 50Hz, and stabilizes after 200-300 hours of use. Some Teresonic customers report hearing a sadden sound improvement, describing it as a “snap-in”, when the drivers reach their specified resonant frequency enabling the acoustic chamber in the cabinet to kick-in and reveal all of the beauty of the Teresonic sound that the reviewer describes as “…the music sound more life-like than with virtually any other speaker I have heard.”

The speaker review process is a nontrivial exercise: involved, expensive, and often, months long. As a manufacturer, we take reviews very seriously and appreciate a knowledgeable and highly professional reviewer like Larry Borden. We hope that readers will be able to learn from his vast audiophile experience and this excellent article – as we did.

  • (Page 1 of 1)

2 Responses to Teresonic Ingenium Floorstanding Speaker Review

  1. Ostap says:

    Maybe it’s time that all speakers, especially those in the 9K or higher range, are broken in BEFORE they are shipped. Especially if, as in the case of the Lowther, it is a defacto issue. Plus the fact that you received a”buzzy” driver from the manufacturer points to a less than stellar QA. 9K and the speaker manufactuer can’t find the time or neccessity to make their product as good as possible straight out of the box? Pretty second( or third) tier approach.

  2. Jonathan says:

    Hear, Hear! I concur entirely sir! Furthermore, I grow weary of any reviewer who rationalizes and minimizes obvious flaws in a product as if they are walking a tight rope over eggshells in order to spare the manufacturer’s feelings. If the lowther driver is known to be shouty and the manufacturer goes through great lengths in attempting to convince the reader that the intentionally live sounding cabinet resonances or that the transmission line/helmholtz/blah blah blah (Proverbial marketing department please insert copyrighted & proprietary sounding acronym describing old technology here->) ETQWT © (thanks…um, where was I? Oh yeah)and it fails to ameliorate the aforementioned sonic aberrations then just call a spade a small shovel and move on to the next topic. Don’t soften the blow for the reader and don’t cut the manufacturer any slack with the constant pandering. It’s insulting to the reader’s intelligence. When a manufacturer who charges $9K for a speaker is making dubious claims that even after 100s of hours of break-in doesn’t correct and critical listening reveals the audible antithesis of the intended outcome then one should begin to question that person’s logic and reasoning skills. Here’s my very brief review. Hobbyist, I mean manufacturer, builds a high efficiency speaker in bizarro world that sounds pretty much as you expect it to given the fact that he ignored over a century of speaker design and innovation, threw caution to the wind, and instead relied upon circular reasoning to suggest that simply because music is made from instruments that resonate from an unbraced, open, and lively enclosure that not only should you design your speaker enclosure to be like an instrument that resonates and that somehow through happenstance you’ll cancel out willy-nilly all the audibly deleterious effects of your “All for None, and One for all” choice in speaker driver. Well, imho, not in any intentional or meaningful way. If you want to lower noise and distortion with a 180 degree out-of-phase signal generator it would behoove one to simply include noise cancellation headphones with every speaker purchase.
    An enclosure’s resonant frequency noise is not likely to cancel-out audible problems, but I guarantee you that the noise it does generate will obscure the very music you are trying to listen to. “Hey, I know!” “Let’s make the speaker cabinet enclosure sing and dance and add to the already pitiful distortion artifacts inherent in most speakers …said no speaker designer… ever. I know let’s just use a single, solitary, quasi full range driver because it not doing anything particularly well acoustically will go unnoticed? Additive vs Subtractive…With regard to perception, It’s understood that it’s often better not to attempt to do something at all (Subtractive degradation); i.e. An acoustic suspension design foregoing bass below 25hz with only a small 6.5” woofer vs (Additive) doing it very poorly with a tuned port at 25hz.. You won’t miss what you don’t hear nearly as much as hearing something done poorly. Next time, Mr. Reviewer, just don’t say anything negative at all if you ultimately are going to qualify your criticism with backpedaling, pandering, and minimizing your own position. It’s noticeably additive in its negative effect on the reader. Other than that, great review!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Popups Powered By :