Publisher Profile

SW1X Audio Design DAC III Review

By: |

SW1X Audio Design, a company based in the UK, was unfamiliar to me before this review, something I suspect will be true of many a North American audiophile. But I hope that after reading this review, you’ll seek out their products, at least to hear, if not to own. To put it quite frankly, the SW1X DAC III reviewed here is a stupendous piece of gear, not because it exceeds other DACs I’ve had in my system, but because it invited me to listen so differently from all the rest.

I don’t use the word “invited” lightly, either. I’ve heard a lot of DACs, and generally feel that I have a mental catalogue of some of the best out there. The Chord DAVE and TT2, Holo Audio May, dCs Vivaldi, old Theta Gen V’s, and a handful of other very special DACs are the kinds of contenders that generally claw their way on to my shortlist. What these DACs do for me I usually think of as bringing the music more up to my expectations of resolution, dynamic punch, transient purity — in short, bringing the music to me.

What the SW1X DAC does is very different from those other DACs, and I suspect the reason lies in its heritage. SW1X Audio Design founder and chief engineer, Dr. Slawa Roschkow (see Interview article), has taken Audio Note UK as an inspiration but not an endpoint, and when I took a peek inside the unit, I was delighted to find not only an extremely well built product, but also an exceptionally well designed one. The circuits are unusual and unabashedly so. The influence from Audio Note UK is clear, both in the tube output stage and the choice of vintage TDA1541 chip. Keen readers with an appetite for classic ‘non-interpolating’ chips, such as the Phillips TDA chips, will recognize this as the rarer and more coveted version of the TDA1547, which is also a popular chip in several modern production DACs.





The output stage is a 5687 or 6N6P dual triode, and the power supply features a choke and tube rectification, and there is zero digital filtering of any kind. This firmly places the DAC III into the ‘all-tube, no oversampling, no filtering’ category. For digital purists who want the most modern digital brickwall filters and megahertz FPGA oversampling technologies, look elsewhere. For those who may find in digital a somewhat sterile, or occasionally less engaging characteristic when compared to vinyl, read on.

In many ways the story of the SW1X, or rather my small view into it, is also the story of my vinyl journey. As a relative youngster by the terms of the hi-fi industry — a wizened 25 — I grew up largely digital. A little over a year ago I began delving into the joys of vinyl, playing with cartridges, collecting records, swapping turntables and phono stages, and generally hearing any music made before 1989 in a totally new light. One thing that particularly strikes me with vinyl is the sense of bass.

A few friends of mine are well-respected vinyl cutting engineers and, in the process of pestering them with questions, I learned that one unique characteristic of vinyl is a rather large bump at 50Hz due to the nature of cutting lathe heads and RIAA curves. In addition to this, vinyl, even in the modern era, is generally made without a digital limiter, two factors that contribute to a couple of very desirable sonic characteristics.

11 Responses to SW1X Audio Design DAC III Review

  1. Mark Carter-Piff says:

    I’d be really interested to read a review that compares the SW1X DAC III to the MHDT Orchid. They use the same chip, they’re both “minimalist” in their implementation of “standard digital” techniques, they both use tubes.

    • Slawa says:

      not everythng that glitters is gold! there is there is simply no comparision. it like comparing a race car and a toy car.

      • Asghar Shah says:

        Unbelievable as it may sound this very DAC D3 + came up for sale yesterday and I jumped at it and purchased it , should be in by the end of the week , I had a Demo model D-2 for about 2 weeks I was simply floored by it , I have never heard a DAC so organic and realistic, the voices were floating around in my living room the musical instruments could easily be discerned on my very cable Floor Standing Daedalus Poseidon Speakers with my QuickSilver Mono Amps which sound like SET at low volume

  2. Michael R says:

    [This may be my first ever reply to an audio review.] I own one of Slawa’s SW1X DAC III+ models, and it does for my music everything you have described. Until this DAC landed in my living room, I’d never dared to use the word ‘magical’ to describe the music coming out of my speakers. I do now.

  3. Adam says:

    Thanks for the review. I just picked up an SW1X Level 3+ dac. So far I’m impressed. Only issue is that there must be more gain with this dac as I have to turn down and set the volume max at 65 on my auralic streamer or my system is too loud. I like to listen in the morning at low volumes when the house is quiet. I’m wondering how does this compare the PS Audio Directstream you reviewed?

    • Asghar Shah says:

      Yes I seem to notice that too with the D-2 I had for about 2 weeks more gain ? as far as comparison goes with PS Directstream DAC 😛 Not even close I own one ! with a Bridge 2 would like to have a comparison with CD Transport listening and Streaming

  4. Tlay says:

    I also just received this DAC about 3 weeks ago. Your review nailed the overall gestalt of this price of art perfectly. I am in love with my cd collection again after sidelining it in favor of vinyl. Kudos to you for an informative and pleasant read. Anyone considering a DAC should not leave SW1X off their demo list.

  5. Timbers 102 says:

    All, appreciate all the comments here. Please excuse my ignorance, but is the device able to switch between inputs – ie SPDIF and USB – depending on the source one is using? ie dedicated CD transport or streamer/player.

  6. Gianluca says:

    Hello Timbers, I think it’s a single input DAC with two possible interfaces. You’ve to swap the USB and SPDIF cables manually. Ready to be proved wrong!

  7. Nelson says:

    How would you rate the sw1x vs Audio Note?

    Is the Dac III still top of your list?

  8. branislav says:

    This dac needs to be compared to Wells Audio Cipher. Too bad it had different reviewers…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Popups Powered By :