Publisher Profile

SW1X Audio Design DAC III Review

By: |

First among these characteristics is bass, plain and simple. There’s a space in between ultra-tight heavily damped solid state bass and loose, somewhat thick bass on tube systems, often single-ended, with not enough feedback or damping. In between these lies the territory of what I like to think of as ‘invisible’, ‘organic’, or ‘natural’ sounding bass. Bass that simply takes on the texture and characteristic of the recording.

Second is liveliness, and while, yes, the curve of groove noise and analog recording and cutting gear can contribute to this, the fact that records are generally unlimited when cut means that even modern vinyl recordings have a dynamic punch and transient definition to them that almost all modern digital recordings lack, primarily because they are heavily limited to be as loud as possible.

Third is a kind of tonal density, a sort of ‘filled in’ and fleshed out sound, which benefits from both of the aforementioned characteristics but which also is something on its own entirely. I’m not sure exactly why this is or what causes it, but it is the opposite of bad digital, which often feels grey, lifeless and as if there are miniature pinholes in the soundstage — a lack of information expressed as absent spots within the sonic image. Vinyl possesses an uncanny depth because it fills in all this space in a particularly vivid way. Even the very best DACs struggle to do this well.

While the space of this review is too short to get into all the minutiae of how digital sampling works, this last concept is one I like to borrow language from image processing to understand. Aliasing and digital loss in images expresses itself as very small missing chunks of color, chromatic aberrations and other deformities in digital pictures, and in my mind is a useful analogue for digital in the sound realm, which often uses similar processing methods; oversampling, aliasing, etc. are common between the two.

Aliasing, one of the primary technological challenges in digital sampling conversion processes, is essentially the creation of harmonics that disrupt the signal, small distortions created by the act of processing musical waveforms in the digital realm and then changing them back into analog waveforms. DACs use various kinds of filters to attempt to deal with these aliasing issues, as well as truncation noise and other digital issues. I’ll spare you the gory and rather dry details of it here. All filters are essentially imperfect in their attempts to do this, but offer various benefits and disadvantages. Careful filter design is the most common method of optimizing the sound of a digital stage in a DAC.

The SW1X DAC III has no filtering stage. It is what is referred to as a ‘Non-Oversampling’ or NOS DAC. It sidesteps a great many problems associated with digital filters, but also trades off some advantages those filters have in phase and frequency accuracy. As mentioned before, however, the DAC III dispenses with solid state buffers, expensive custom-programmed FPGA chips and anything attempting to resemble a perfectly measuring, sub-noise floor distortion measurement device. In this case I consider that a good thing.

Why? Aside from the fact that I believe multiple decimal place THD numbers are often hiding too much damping from excessive feedback and attempting to pass off high harmonics as ‘clean’, the end result of any audio device in my mind is to reproduce the recording according to the tastes of the listener. I value neutrality of frequency in speakers because it presents me a window into the music. In componentry I often find a little editorializing can help sell me an illusion of how a recording sounds that I almost always find more believable than the illusion that ultra-low distortion perfect-measuring amplifiers give me. They’re both illusions ultimately, so why not pick the one you like sonically?

The SW1X does this, yet in a way that is not altogether as colored as one might expect given the retro chip and heavily tube-reliant analog stage. It does not color the output stage by making things slow, thick, woofy or any of those other adjectives I’ve heard assigned to amplifiers that we often think of as the opposite of fast and resolving.

In fact, the SW1X is lightning fast and ultra-resolving. More resolving than most of the DACs I have in my system, maybe even besting in resolution a $14,000 unit I won’t name. It’s not the kind of antiseptic resolution that is all bunched together at the front of the soundstage though. The detail is orderly and arranged, composed evenly from front to back, left to right, top to bottom and even diagonally according to room dimensions on particularly transparent recordings. One can simply hear more of the spatial cues, the microdynamics, the plankton of the recordings with the SW1X than with most DACs I have ever used and currently own or have in for audition. And I have some top notch competition in house.

Two things aid this spatial orderliness. First is a sense that bass is more impactful, punchier, not bloated but just more dynamic, more epic, of a larger scale around 50Hz than with typical digital. Second is that there is a density to the sound, a kind of filling in of missing spaces, which much digital lacks. It’s as if someone has filled in the spaces that were missing with much digital, seeming to have this effect somehow even on limited digital recordings. The macrodynamic character is enhanced, the transients are given life and jump to life, tangible and tactile, almost real enough to touch — or at least they feel that way.

If these descriptions sound familiar it’s because they are. Yes, the SW1X sounds like vinyl to me. Or at least it has similar characteristics to vinyl. Certainly, no DAC will ever sound exactly like vinyl, and so the SW1X is at times maybe even more dense and thickly composed than vinyl, whereas the real analog deal is sometimes smoother, a little more characterful in the high end, a little less even in the mids in a very subtle way. This is apples to oranges though; a phonostage and cartridge can’t be exactly compared to a DAC and its output stage.

What can be compared is the feeling one has when listening to them. The SW1X has that captivating, dynamic, raucous, impossible to ignore quality that my vinyl playback system has. It leaps into the room, makes music somehow totally unfatiguing and yet demanding attention, saying ‘listen, must listen to me’, and generally makes a mess of other plans or obligations.

In comparison to my other DACs, the SW1X possesses perhaps a slight richness, a slightly subdued character in the treble, but I find this to suit nearly every digital recording I can find, and even extremely purist classical and bluegrass records stand to benefit from a little low end weight and the mild silkiness of the treble.

My speakers, the ProAc D30RS, certainly don’t lack for treble information, however, coming equipped with lightning fast ribbon tweeters. I’ve never heard them sound harsh or bright, but I can imagine with warm amps, a warm preamp, and with warm speakers it is conceivable that one could find the SW1X perhaps a little too subdued, though I would point to this as a problem of matching attendant gear rather than the fault of the DAC.

Other than this my only nitpick is a rather bare and standard functionality: no XLR outputs, S/PDIF input only, and the like. However, take a gander at the SW1X website and you’ll quickly see that this is not a cookie-cutter product. SW1X DACs may be outfitted with a veritable buffet of options, and I’m certain that any specific tastes, gear matching concerns or other special requests are likely to be satiated. This is a company in pursuit of absolute musical perfection and, for those with the budget, flights of fancy can be met. Aside from this, the chassis is quite large and rather plain, but I find this inconsequential when compared with the sound on offer.

So that’s it, my only minor notes, not even complaints, really just conditional notes. The SW1X DAC III is quite simply one of the best DACs I have ever heard, perhaps even the best. If musical engagement factor with digital playback is the metric, then it is far and away the best DAC I have auditioned in my system. Music poured effortlessly out of my system, and combined with a pair of ampsandsound Zion monoblocks and a homebrew OTL preamp, I’d never heard my system do . . . well, everything. Bass is massive, the midrange is open, meticulously, forensically detailed yet also rich and dense, and treble notes seem to hang for hours in my living room. I am very seriously considering reaching out and asking after an SW1X DAC for myself when funds permit. I have been a digital hi-fi enthusiast my entire life, heard the cream of vintage and modern DACs of all stripes, and I can confidently say the SW1X is the first one I can imagine ending my digital journey with. It offers nothing less than total musical satisfaction, at least for this listener.

Price: $5,995 USD

Copy editor: Dan Rubin

U.S. Distributors:

Sadurni Acoustics (Texas)

Lotus Group USA (California)

Also read: Interview with Slawa Roschkow of SW1X from England (2018)

 

9 Responses to SW1X Audio Design DAC III Review


  1. Mark Carter-Piff says:

    I’d be really interested to read a review that compares the SW1X DAC III to the MHDT Orchid. They use the same chip, they’re both “minimalist” in their implementation of “standard digital” techniques, they both use tubes.

    • Slawa says:

      not everythng that glitters is gold! there is there is simply no comparision. it like comparing a race car and a toy car.

      • Asghar Shah says:

        Unbelievable as it may sound this very DAC D3 + came up for sale yesterday and I jumped at it and purchased it , should be in by the end of the week , I had a Demo model D-2 for about 2 weeks I was simply floored by it , I have never heard a DAC so organic and realistic, the voices were floating around in my living room the musical instruments could easily be discerned on my very cable Floor Standing Daedalus Poseidon Speakers with my QuickSilver Mono Amps which sound like SET at low volume

  2. Michael R says:

    [This may be my first ever reply to an audio review.] I own one of Slawa’s SW1X DAC III+ models, and it does for my music everything you have described. Until this DAC landed in my living room, I’d never dared to use the word ‘magical’ to describe the music coming out of my speakers. I do now.

  3. Adam says:

    Thanks for the review. I just picked up an SW1X Level 3+ dac. So far I’m impressed. Only issue is that there must be more gain with this dac as I have to turn down and set the volume max at 65 on my auralic streamer or my system is too loud. I like to listen in the morning at low volumes when the house is quiet. I’m wondering how does this compare the PS Audio Directstream you reviewed?

    • Asghar Shah says:

      Yes I seem to notice that too with the D-2 I had for about 2 weeks more gain ? as far as comparison goes with PS Directstream DAC 😛 Not even close I own one ! with a Bridge 2 would like to have a comparison with CD Transport listening and Streaming

  4. Tlay says:

    I also just received this DAC about 3 weeks ago. Your review nailed the overall gestalt of this price of art perfectly. I am in love with my cd collection again after sidelining it in favor of vinyl. Kudos to you for an informative and pleasant read. Anyone considering a DAC should not leave SW1X off their demo list.

  5. Timbers 102 says:

    All, appreciate all the comments here. Please excuse my ignorance, but is the device able to switch between inputs – ie SPDIF and USB – depending on the source one is using? ie dedicated CD transport or streamer/player.

  6. Gianluca says:

    Hello Timbers, I think it’s a single input DAC with two possible interfaces. You’ve to swap the USB and SPDIF cables manually. Ready to be proved wrong!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Popups Powered By : XYZScripts.com